Sunday, May 31, 2009

15 Years in a Nutshell

For those of us who grew up in the technological dark ages, the advent of online social networking and powerful search engines has made it possible to reconnect with friends after separations spanning decades. In the past year I've gotten back in touch with people I haven't seen since the fourth grade (a third of a century ago!).

Each renewed acquaintance brings with it a need to account for my activities since our last contact. It happened again this weekend: I became a Facebook friend of the person who was the closest thing to an SGA advisor I had in college, after being out of touch for roughly 15 years. So how do you boil down a decade and a half of your life, and convey something of the person you've become? When my old acquaintance knew me, I was an undergraduate getting ready to head off to Harvard Law School. I was driven and impatient. I was young. His was a presence I took for granted back then; it never occurred to me to think about how he ended up in his job, working with student leaders. Now I find myself working in a role similar to one he was in long ago. How to explain?

Here's what I said:

"I guess you could say I stumbled into Student Affairs, in the sense that I didn’t even have a conception of Student Affairs as a profession until I was employed in it. As you know, I had gone to law school and then practiced in a Los Angeles firm. I hated almost every minute of it. The work was meaningless to me, the culture was toxic, and I had a very tough time playing the part of a hard-driving litigator (one of my supervisors appreciated my research and writing skills but said I lacked the “killer instinct”). I quit, determined to find something meaningful to do, but also struggling with a lot of confusion and doubt. I felt that the choices that had led me to become a lawyer had been poor ones, and I didn’t want to make another mistake.

After months of exploration, I took a job with a startup nonprofit based in Boston doing community organizing projects in cities all over the United States. The work was unglamorous, but it was powerful and felt real to me. I stayed with the organization for six years, taking on leadership roles and developing ideas about civic engagement and social change.

I left the community organizing group in 2002 to start my own nonprofit, with the idea of helping public agencies inspire and organize their constituents to make civic contributions. For example, we worked with the San Diego City Schools on a strategy for using Title I funds to engage parents in their kids’ education. I hoped to get some national funding to start a project that would have involved working with college student governments to teach them about community organizing and democratic engagement. But my timing was awful (post-September 11th, funders were more focused on bricks-and-mortar projects, less on idealistic abstractions), and I never got the big grant that might have catapulted the organization to success. I was also realizing that trying to change the world as a consultant (i.e., an outsider to the institutions I wanted to influence) had serious drawbacks. After my wife and I moved to the Washington DC area, I started looking for a job that would provide opportunities to pursue my passions with more support.

I saw an ad for a position advising the student government at a nearby university, spoke with the department head about some of the things I wanted to try . . . and here I am, six years later. It has been a magical experience. The work is meaningful, and I apply lessons from every part of my life every day.

Sometimes I wish I had considered Student Affairs much earlier, so I could have avoided some of the rougher patches along my career path. But the truth is I probably needed to do things like spend a couple of miserable years as a corporate lawyer just to dispel the false attraction of trying to fulfill other people’s expectations for me at the cost of my happiness and sense of purpose. Plus my setbacks and missteps have been as valuable as my enjoyable adventures as sources of insights and anecdotes I can use to nudge, support and help liberate student leaders."

Thursday, May 14, 2009

My Ultimate Exam Story

I suppose I’ve taken hundreds of exams. In law school most of them counted for 100% of the course grade, so that a single mental hiccup could mean the difference between an “A” and a “B” or worse. I’ve had my moments of panic, my lapses and heroic recoveries. I’ve lived through plenty of test drama. But nothing in my experience, my friends, compares with what happened to me during the California Bar Exam.

The California Bar Exam is a three-day test, the outcome of which determines whether you are entitled to practice law. It is offered twice each year, so failing makes you essentially unemployable for six months. The pass rate ranges from roughly 35% to 65%. When I was feeling anxious in the months before the exam, I tried to comfort myself by finding statistics showing that first-time takers, or people who went to my law school, passed at a higher rate. But no matter where they went to law school, or how high their grades had been, a decent fraction of test-takers failed. There was simply no dodging the possibility that I might go down in flames.

I spent half the summer taking review classes in preparation for the exam, then checked into the big airport hotel along with hundreds of other test-takers unwilling to risk the distractions of home or the perils of traffic. I managed to sleep a little during the long night before it began, but only after hopping out of bed time after time to check my notes when I couldn’t immediately recall some stray fact or rule I just knew would be on the test. In the morning I stumbled into the enormous ballroom along with the rest of Southern California’s aspiring lawyers and found my place at one of the long rows of tables. Proctors took their positions around the room, ready to guard against cheaters. The test book sat in front of me. The clock wound down to zero hour.

Day One consisted of six essay questions to be answered in six hours. The first question had four parts, and after 53 minutes I had only completed part one. My hand was flying across the pages while my mind sped along two tracks, one focused on the test and the other on the consequences of failing it. I made up the time along the way, and finished the day with a sore hand and absolutely no idea how well I was doing. I slept even less that night than I had the night before.

Day Two involved two three-hour multiple choice tests, each with 100 questions. I finished the first three-hour test with no time to spare and felt like I had barely had a chance to skim some of the later questions. At the beginning of the third hour of the second multiple choice test, I was actually behind on time and knew I would have to move even more quickly through the remaining questions despite my fatigue. The questions seemed to be getting harder, and I was less and less sure of my responses, and then . . . it happened. I read question #73, chose a response, went to mark it in pencil on the Scantron (bubble sheet) form, and . . . saw that I had already filled a response to question #73. I also had filled in responses to all 72 previous questions. Somewhere between questions 1 and 73, I had messed up the sequence; all of my answers from that point might be wrong, and now my time was going to run out.

So I imploded. I opened my mouth wide and emitted a little strangling sound, a stifled scream.

And I levitated. I twisted my body in an attempt to flee without actually leaving my seat, and I swear I was two feet I the air. A proctor shot me a look that said, “You are two seconds from being disqualified and condemned to wallow in freakish misery forever.” I sat back down. I stared at the test, and tried to figure out what to do next.

I began to work my way backward through the questions, and discovered my numbering error around #70. Having corrected it, I raced ahead and somehow finished the test on time. That night I sat in my hotel bed trying to study and realized that I was having trouble breathing. Each time I inhaled I felt sharp, stabbing pains in my chest. My shoulder muscles began to feel like they were on fire, and when I touched my skin I heard bizarre crackling sounds, like Rice Krispies in milk. “Yup, I’m really nervous all right,” I thought.

Day Three was a return to essays: six questions, six hours. And then it was done, and I went home, still dealing with deep chest and muscle pain, but otherwise feeling nothing but relief and exhaustion.

That was Thursday, July 30, 1992. I was scheduled to fly across the country on Saturday, August 1st. But when I spoke Thursday night with a friend who had just graduated from medical school, he suggested that I see a doctor and ask for a chest X-ray before getting on a plane. He worried that my symptoms indicated that air had escaped from my lungs into my chest cavity, and that if I took a cross-country flight the pressure changes could tear my lung wall.

And he was right. An X-ray taken the next day showed that I had suffered a spontaneous pneumomediastinum, basically a lung rupture. The muscle pain and crackling sounds had been caused by air bubbles escaping into my chest and then traveling into my shoulder muscles. Under the circumstances, I was told, taking the flight could have been fatal. The doctor told me that a spontaneous pneumomediastinum could not be caused by any physical movement on my part; they just happen sometimes to people of a certain age and build. I am not qualified to challenge his medical opinion, but I believe he’s wrong: I have no doubt that adrenaline-induced body movement that lifted me out of my seat on Day Two also damaged my lung.

I’m not proud of it, OK?

But I did pass the test.

Good luck on your exams! Please try not to levitate until you're done.

Sunday, May 3, 2009

When Cooler Heads Prevail

When cooler heads prevail, we’ll all cut each other some slack. We’ll give each other space to figure things out. We’ll take the long view.

When cooler heads prevail, we’ll embrace the rough-and-tumble. We’ll honor our differences and discover our deep commonalities. We’ll dare to jump onto the public stage. The prospect of anonymity will not tempt us to be cruel. We’ll comment without malice. We’ll turn the other cheek.

When cooler heads prevail, our headlines will match our stories: sincere and measured, not sensational and mean. Then people won’t sit outside my office and shout at each other about how “gay” and “retarded” things are. We’ll be considerate, not out of political correctness, but because we feel deep respect for the people with whom we share the space, the campus, and the moment. We’ll keep it real, but also keep an open mind. We'll teach each other, and learn together.

When cooler heads prevail, we’ll see victory beneath the surface defeat. We’ll push hard to improve our community, to make it more just, more welcoming, more perfect. But we will not forget to love the things we have already: this place, each other, this time in our lives. We’ll recognize our power, and take full responsibility. We’ll give it our all. We’ll set the tone.

Friday, May 1, 2009

Yasmin and Jen

Meet Yasmin Karimian and Jennifer Kent, SGA's President-elect and Executive Vice President-elect. Then apply to join them in the 2009-2010 SGA by following this link.

Saturday, April 25, 2009

Power Forward Baltimore

One of the six social change projects developed by students in UMBC’s Civic Imagination and Social Entrepreneurship course last fall is already making an impact in our city. Power Forward Baltimore is a basketball league for homeless men, conceived as a way to build participants’ self-esteem and sense of social support and community. The project is being spearheaded by UMBC student Charlie Rubenstein, who planned it with fellow students Alex Hyland, Jaree Colbert and Jennifer Kent.

Check out the Power Forward Baltimore blog here to read about the launch of this exciting project. If you want to take the Civic Imagination and Social Entrepreneurship class (POLI 209, AMST 280, SOCY 298, EDUC 299) next fall, there’s still time to register, but it's filling up fast.

Thursday, April 23, 2009

SGA Election Results

Total Number of Votes Cast: 2,448 (beating the previous record of 2,365, set four years ago).


PRESIDENT AND EXECUTIVE VICE PRESIDENT

Yasmin Karimian and Jennifer Kent: 2,020 votes (92.7%)


Write-ins: 159 votes (7.3%)


VICE PRESIDENT FOR STUDENT ORGANIZATIONS

Brian Frazee: 1,207 votes (54.5%)


Paula McCusker: 950 votes (42.9%)

Write-ins: 116 votes (2.7%)


TREASURER

James McCauley: 961 votes (43.9%)


Nikunj Divecha: 620 votes (28.3%)

Stefan Victor: 567 votes (25.9%)

Write-ins: 43 votes (2.0%)


SENATOR (Top 11 are elected)

Simmi Singh: 958 votes


Toby Le: 889 votes


Justin Lane: 799 votes


Josh Michael: 771 votes


Sunaina Khandelwal: 732 votes


Justin Donlan: 712 votes


Matt McNey: 696


Stavros Halkias: 667


Rahilla Tarfa: 644


Juan Callazos: 636


Mark Gradoni: 574 votes


Gavin Way: 572 votes

Tae Oh: 568 votes

Surena Ebrahimi: 557 votes

Tim Mantegna: 483 votes

Josh Paiva: 467 votes

Michael Rakoski: 436 votes

Write-ins: 52 votes


FINANCE BOARD REPRESENTATIVE (Top 5 are elected)

Emily Han: 1,036 votes


Christine Paul: 924 votes


Tehmeena Hassan: 671 votes


Sekinah Hassan: 656 votes


Nicholas Keller: 619 votes


Adenike Orogade: 601 votes

Lena Dewald: 534 votes

Write-ins: 42 votes


REFERENDUM A (Student Activity Fee Increase)

Yes: 1,536 votes (69.4%)


No: 677 votes (30.6%)


REFERENDUM B (SGA Constitution Amendments)

Yes: 1,268 votes (62.5%)


No: 760 votes (37.5%)


Congratulations to everyone who was elected, had the courage to run, or took the time to cast a vote.

Wednesday, April 22, 2009

SGA Election News

The Election Board sent out an email late last night (Tuesday) announcing that with a full day of voting still ahead, the total turnout for this election already had surpassed last year's total of 1,844. Turnout today will determine whether the election sets a new UMBC record. The current turnout record is 2,365, set four years ago.

The vote tally as of last night already had surpassed this year's turnout at College Park and Towson as a percentage of the student body.

The Election Board will announce the results tomorrow, Thursday, April 23rd at 4:00 p.m. in the Student Organizations Area on The Commons' 2nd floor.

The election ends tonight (Wednesday) at 11:59 p.m., so if you haven't done so already, follow this link to the SGA voting site and cast your ballot! If you have any problems with the voting process, please email me immediately (dhoffman@umbc.edu) so I can ensure that your vote gets counted.

Update: Election results are here.

Monday, April 20, 2009

The SGA Election: Vote Now

To read about the candidates and issues, follow this link to the official SGA voting site.

To vote now, follow these instructions carefully:

1. Open a new browser window and log in to Blackboard.

2. Either go through Blackboard to enter the ‘2009 SGA Election’ community OR return to this page and follow the link below that corresponds to your last name:

Last names from A – Egwom
Last names from Ehlman – Koval
Last names from Kowalewski – Propst
Last names from Prosser – Zyla

3. Once you reach the ballot, do NOT hit the back button on your browser before completing the voting process.

If you have any trouble voting, send an email to me, David Hoffman, at dhoffman@umbc.edu.

The election ends this Wednesday (4/22) at 11:59 p.m.

Update: Election results are here.

The SGA Election: Why Vote?

Will the world change for the worse if you don’t vote in the SGA election? Actually, yes. What matters even more than the specific votes you cast is that you be counted as having voted at all.

Students’ power to create the campus life they want hinges on being able to pull together and express a reasonably unified point of view. When you have student leaders elected in a high-turnout election, the people to whom they speak on behalf of students--campus administrators, public officials and others--know they have to listen. This isn’t a situation in which your being passive is the same as being neutral. If you don’t vote, you actively make it harder for next year’s SGA to accomplish anything on your behalf.

That‘s all the more true when you have an election like this one, in which there are four hotly contested races and a crucial ballot initiative, but no competition at the top of the ticket. Yasmin Karimian and Jennifer Kent are experienced and well-known, but their ability to move ahead with their hopes for campus life will hinge in part on your giving them a mandate to do so. Not so long ago, turnout in SGA elections never exceeded 1,000 votes. For the past five years it has ranged between 1,492 and 2,365, an increase that has positioned SGA to make meaningful progress on a wide range of issues. How high will it go this year? That’s up to you.

The rest of the ballot is full of intriguing contrasts: Paula McCusker and Brian Frazee’s takes on how to serve student organizations; Nikunj Divecha, Stefan Victor and James McCauley’s plans for making the most of the money SGA manages; and the various visions offered by 17 Senate and 7 Finance Board candidates. Even if just one of these candidates strikes you as the kind of person who will stand up for what you care about and make changes that stick, take a minute to give that candidate your vote.

If undergraduates don’t approve Referendum A in the SGA election this week, there will be periodic campus-wide blackouts.

OK, I’m kidding about that. But it would have a noticeable impact. The $78/year fee is by far the smallest of the six fees paid by every student, but what it funds makes a big difference in the quality of campus life. After six years frozen at its current level, the fee’s purchasing power has shrunk due to inflation by $11/year per student, even as campus life has improved. Now SGA is asking to make up $10 of that gap starting in fall 2010. What do you want for the future of campus life at UMBC? Whatever your opinion, voting on Referendum A is worth a few minutes of your time. (From Monday 4/20 through Wednesday 4/22, follow this link to vote).

Running in a campus-wide election takes guts. The students on the ballot are willing to accept the awkwardness of seeking votes and the risk of losing in order to get a shot at doing something real and beneficial for the whole UMBC community. I appreciate their courage, and wish them all well this week!

Update: Election results are here.

Sunday, April 12, 2009

UMBC By the Numbers II

48.7 = Percentage of applicants for UMBC’s fall 2008 freshman class who were men
51.3 = Percentage of applicants for UMBC’s fall 2008 freshman class who were women

53.1 = Percentage of students accepted for UMBC’s fall 2008 freshman class who were men
46.9 = Percentage of students accepted for UMBC’s fall 2008 freshman class who were women

58.3 = Percentage of UMBC freshman (those who were accepted and chose to attend UMBC) in fall 2008 who were men
41.7 = Percentage of UMBC freshman (those who were accepted and chose to attend UMBC) in fall 2008 who were women (view source)

41.5 = Years since the first UMBC SGA election (September 1967)
0 = Number of times two women have been elected to the positions of SGA President and (Executive) Vice President (this year, Yasmin Karimian and Jennifer Kent are the only declared candidates for those positions)

4.3 = The Student Activity Fee (the only fee managed and used by students to create programs and services for students) as a percentage of all UMBC student fees, as of fall 2003
3.3 = The Student Activity Fee as a percentage of all UMBC student fees, as of fall 2009

6 = Years since the last increase in the Student Activity Fee
15 = Percent increase in the Consumer Price Index since the fee last increased
78 = Amount (in dollars) of the Student Activity Fee paid annually by full-time undergrads as of fall 2003
90 = Amount (in dollars) required in 2009 to purchase what $78 could purchase in 2003 (view source)
88 = Amount (in dollars) of the Student Activity Fee (starting in fall 2010) if undergraduates approve Referendum A, the campus life referendum proposed by SGA, in the election next week

7 = Number of votes that decided the closest race in an SGA election in the past few years, for Treasurer in 2007 (David Indek received 957 votes, Phil Graff received 950)

3 = Number of times in the past 4 SGA elections that UMBC’s voter turnout has exceeded turnout for the SGA elections at both UM-College Park and Towson University, as a percentage of the student body.

0 = Number of the 7 candidates for the 5 SGA Finance Board Representative positions who currently serve as voting members of the Finance Board